Fantastic flick or a flop? Using the Rotten Tomatoes reviews, let's see how summer blockbusters have done so far...
It's interesting to me how different critics react to movies than non-critics. A lot of movies I've sincerely enjoyed and appreciated have been rated kind of "meh" on RT, which can be seen by the general score vs. % who liked it. In the end, I think there's a certain element of
Superman: Man of Steel 56%
World War Z 67%
The Lone Ranger 26%
Monsters University 78%
White House Down 48%
Kevin Hart's comedy show was rated higher and made more money than Man of Steel: ouch. I'm sure it didn't cost as much to produce, either.
Maybe critic taste doesn't equal a good movie. After all, not everyone can handle brilliant, artfully does films. Some people are a bit more simple minded and like their movies that way perhaps.
What makes a truly great movie? Helicopter cinematography and big budgets, or a simple, but thought provoking message? Does a movie having "art" really mean anything anymore? Is it completely based on the audience's reaction and reception, or maybe some movies were just before their time? Discussion is welcome...
It's interesting to me how different critics react to movies than non-critics. A lot of movies I've sincerely enjoyed and appreciated have been rated kind of "meh" on RT, which can be seen by the general score vs. % who liked it. In the end, I think there's a certain element of
Superman: Man of Steel 56%
World War Z 67%
The Lone Ranger 26%
Monsters University 78%
White House Down 48%
Kevin Hart's comedy show was rated higher and made more money than Man of Steel: ouch. I'm sure it didn't cost as much to produce, either.
Maybe critic taste doesn't equal a good movie. After all, not everyone can handle brilliant, artfully does films. Some people are a bit more simple minded and like their movies that way perhaps.
What makes a truly great movie? Helicopter cinematography and big budgets, or a simple, but thought provoking message? Does a movie having "art" really mean anything anymore? Is it completely based on the audience's reaction and reception, or maybe some movies were just before their time? Discussion is welcome...